Law Society expresses strong reservations over Land Registry privatisation plans

Law Society expresses strong reservations over Land Registry privatisation plans

Responding to the government’s consultation on the transfer of Land Registry operations to the private sector, the Law Society of England and Wales has stressed the need for continued state guarantee and safeguards to minimise the risk of corruption and fraud.

A Law Society spokesperson said:

‘The Law Society is not convinced, from the information supplied to date, that sufficiently robust safeguards will be imposed and successfully enforced if the Land Registry’s operations were sold off. Without solid assurances on these issues, the Land Registry should remain in public ownership.


‘Government’s imperative to reduce the budget deficit should not drive the privatisation of the Land Registry. Decisions about the sale must hinge on the long-term ramifications and management of the significant risks that have been identified.’

The Law Society response also highlights the need to ensure that, if the transfer happens, any new owner is bound to deliver the high standards of service from knowledgeable staff that users have come to expect.

‘The Land Registry works within our critical national infrastructure. If privatisation does go ahead, robust safeguards must be in place from the outset to protect the interests of users and taxpayers for the long term.


‘Although government proposes to retain ownership of the registers, selling off the rest of the Land Registry’s operations to the private sector could create conflicts of interest and raise competition issues.


‘There is also a risk of an adverse impact on the impartiality of registration services, which are critical to the trust and confidence of users.’

The Law Society have stated that in any sell-off, safeguards would be required to address the following issues:

  • competition and conflicts of interest,
  • security and protection against corruption and fraud,
  • data protection, data provision, the applicability of Freedom of Information legislation,
  • a state guarantee and the related indemnity provision,
  • contingency plans to ensure continuity of service if the private company fails,
  • safeguards to ensure the quality and impartiality of registration decisions,
  • accessible and cost effective redress systems,
  • fee controls for registration services, and
  • meeting public policy objectives.

The Law Society’s response can be found at

Terms and Conditions | Site Map | Privacy and Cookies

Copyright © 2020 Richard Nelson LLP and Murdochs. All rights reserved.
The Lawyers Defence Group is operated by Richard Nelson LLP, a Limited Liability Partnership authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and whose partnership number is OC357136 and Murdochs Solicitors, who are also authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, and whose SRA number is 52683.
Please note that all advice, guidance, representation and assistance, legal or otherwise, is provided either by those firms or by appropriate referral to other suitably qualified persons. No advice, guidance, assistance, representation or other support is provided by or in the name of the Lawyers Defence Group.
For further details please refer to the terms and conditions for use of this web site and to the terms and conditions of the firms involved.
The professional rules governing our lawyers can be found at